Original Intent Of Marriage
Tap/Click to Read the previous related article
"One Flesh" Is Not Marriage — A Theological Reconstruction of Genesis 2-3
Marriage - Divorce - Repentance (2)
Correcting the Institutional Reading of the Eden Narrative
By: [Author's Name]
---
Abstract
The previous article radically distinguished between 'ishah (a generic designation of origin) and Chavvah (a personal name as a declaration of faith). This follow-up article examines another equally fundamental exegetical error: reading Genesis 2:24 as the "institution of marriage" in the Garden of Eden. By carefully examining the Hebrew text—particularly the phrase "one flesh" (basar echad) and the condition "they were not ashamed" (lo yitboshashu)—this article argues that "one flesh" in Eden is not marriage, but an ontological reality about the existential unity of humanity before God. Marriage as an institution only emerges after sin, as God's response to the fall. This reading has radical implications for the theology of marriage, eschatology, and our understanding of the purpose of creation.
---
Chapter 1: The Problem of the Institutional Reading
1.1 The Error That Has Become Cultural
For centuries, Genesis 2:24 has been read as the "institution of marriage" established by God in Eden:
"Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh."
In sermons, teaching, and wedding liturgies, this verse is elevated as the "biblical foundation" that marriage is the original creation, valid for all time, and is the purpose of human creation.
However, this reading contains three serious problems:
- Problem | Explanation
- Prolepsis | Verse 24 is a narrator's statement (editorial), not a word from Adam or God, and speaks about the future ("shall leave"), not a description of Eden at that time
- Nakedness | If they were already "married" in Eden, why were they "not ashamed"? Marriage actually presupposes awareness of nakedness and sexual desire
- No ceremony | There is no word for "covenant" (berit), no "taking" (laqach) as a marriage term, no "becoming husband and wife" — all marriage terminology appears after sin
1.2 The Hebrew Text to Be Examined
Genesis 2:24 in the Masoretic Text:
עַל־כֵּן יַעֲזָב־אִישׁ אֶת־אָבִיו וְאֶת־אִמּוֹ וְדָבַק בְּאִשְׁתּוֹ וְהָיוּ לְבָשָׂר אֶחָד
Transliteration:
Al-ken ya'azav-ish et-aviv ve-et-immo ve-davaq be-ishto ve-hayu le-basar echad.
Literal translation:
"Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh."
Critical Note:
- Element | Explanation
- עַל־כֵּן (al-ken) | "Therefore" — indicates that this verse is a logical conclusion from what just happened (the creation of the woman), not a command from God
- יַעֲזָב (ya'azav) | "shall leave" — imperfect form, indicates a future action, not present reality
- וְהָיוּ (ve-hayu) | "and they shall become" — again future
This verse does not describe the status of Adam and Eve in Eden. This verse projects what will happen in the world after Eden.
---
Chapter 2: "One Flesh" — Ontological Reality, Not Institution
2.1 The Meaning of "One Flesh" in Hebrew
The phrase בָּשָׂר אֶחָד (basar echad) literally means "one flesh" or "one flesh unity."
- Element | Meaning | Implication
- בָּשָׂר (basar) | Flesh, body, human weakness | Emphasizes physical and existential reality, not law or contract
- אֶחָד (echad) | One, unity | Indicates a single identity, not two individuals uniting
In Hebrew thought, basar is not merely the "physical body," but the totality of human existence—including passions, weaknesses, and limitations. Thus, "one flesh" means:
"They are one existential unity — like one being divided into two forms."
2.2 The Difference Between "One Flesh" and Marriage
- Aspect | "One Flesh" in Eden | Marriage in the Fallen World
- Basis | Ontological reality — they were indeed one being | Legal/covenantal bond — two individuals becoming one
- Purpose | To show the unity of humanity before God | To preserve offspring, regulate desire, restrain sin
- Awareness | Without shame, without divided self-consciousness | With shame, with awareness of difference and desire
- Nature | Ontologically permanent | Temporarily eschatological (Matt. 22:30)
- Condition | Without death, without offspring | In the midst of death, through offspring
2.3 Evidence from Verse 25
"They were both naked, the man and his wife, but they were not ashamed." (Gen. 2:25)
The word לֹא יִתְבֹּשָׁשׁוּ (lo yitboshashu) = "they were not ashamed" — hitpael form of bosh (to be ashamed).
This is an editorial comment that separates verse 24 from the present reality:
- Verse | Status
- 24 | "Shall leave... shall become one flesh" — future
- 25 | "They were naked... but not ashamed" — present
The author of Genesis deliberately placed verse 24 as prolepsis, and verse 25 as a description of the Edenic state. This means:
"One flesh" in verse 24 is not Edenic reality, but a projection of how humans would live after the fall.
---
Chapter 3: Nakedness Before Sin — The Forgotten Key
3.1 "Not Ashamed" as an Indicator of Consciousness
"Until the transgression, Adam did not know that they were naked. This is an important clue."
This is very important. Let us analyze what it means:
- Before Sin | After Sin
- Naked but did not know (not ashamed) | Eyes opened, knew they were naked (Gen. 3:7)
- Nakedness was not an object of knowledge | Nakedness became a problem — they felt exposed
- Lived in transparency without distance | Lived in awareness that gave birth to shame
- No divided self-reflection | There is an "I" that sees "myself" as an object
What does this mean?
Before sin, Adam and Eve did not yet have divided self-consciousness. They did not see themselves as objects. They lived in the direct presence of God, without filter, without distance between "I" and "my body."
This means:
"One flesh" in Genesis 2:24 is not marriage, because marriage presupposes awareness of difference, need, and incompleteness — all of which only emerged after sin.
3.2 Why Did Awareness of Nakedness Only Emerge After Sin?
In existential psychology, shame arises when:
1. There is distance between self and others/God.
2. There is comparison — "I am not as I should be."
3. There is fear of rejection — "they will see my lack."
In Eden, there was no distance, no comparison, no fear. Adam and Eve lived in the direct presence of God — they did not need to "cover" themselves because there was nothing to hide.
After sin, they:
Became aware of the distance from God (they hid).
Became aware of the difference from each other (they covered themselves separately).
Felt fear (Gen. 3:10).
Shame is an indicator that the unity of "one flesh" had been broken. They now saw themselves, not God.
---
Chapter 4: If Not Marriage, Then What Is "One Flesh"?
4.1 "One Flesh" as Ontological Reality
In the Edenic context, "one flesh" is:
- Not | But
- Legal/covenantal marriage bond | Ontological reality — they are one being divided into two forms
- Conscious sexual union | Existential unity — Adam said: "Bone of my bone, flesh of my flesh" (Gen. 2:23)
- Social institution with rules | Creational reality — like two halves forming one whole
Evidence: Adam did not seek Eve because of "loneliness" or "sexual need." He slept, then woke and found she was already there. God built (banah) the woman, not "made" (asah) her like the animals. This is divine architectural work, not an answer to Adam's need.
4.2 "One Flesh" as a Picture of Fellowship with God
If we read "one flesh" theologically, it is:
"A picture of perfect human fellowship with God — where there is no distance, no shame, no need to 'explain' oneself."
In the New Testament, Paul uses "one flesh" to describe:
- Verse | Usage
- Eph. 5:31-32 | "Therefore a man shall leave... and the two shall become one flesh. This mystery is profound, but I am speaking about Christ and the church."
- 1 Cor. 6:16-17 | "Or do you not know that he who is joined to a prostitute becomes one body with her? ... But he who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with Him."
Paul understood that "one flesh" is not merely about marriage, but about existential union — both with God (in Christ) and with sin (in sexual immorality).
4.3 "One Flesh" as Eschatological Reality
Jesus said in Matthew 22:30:
"For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven."
If marriage is the original creation and eternal reality, why did Jesus say that in the resurrection there is no marriage?
The answer: Marriage is a temporary reality for the fallen world. "One flesh" in Eden is a picture of fellowship with God that will be restored in heaven — where there is no marriage, no death, no offspring, only the direct presence of God.
---
Chapter 5: When Did Marriage Begin?
5.1 The Genesis 2-4 Narrative Chronologically
- Order | Verse | Event | Relationship Status
- 1 | Gen. 2:23 | Adam called her 'ishah | Declaration of origin, not marriage
- 2 | Gen. 2:24 | Narrator projects "one flesh" | Prolepsis about the future
- 3 | Gen. 2:25 | They were naked, not ashamed | Ontological unity without awareness
- 4 | Gen. 3:6-7 | They ate, eyes opened, ashamed | Divided self-consciousness emerged
- 5 | Gen. 3:20 | Adam named her Chavvah | Declaration of faith — they are bound in destiny
- 6 | Gen. 3:21-24 | They were driven out of Eden | Entering the world where marriage is needed
- 7 | Gen. 4:1 | Adam knew Eve | This is marriage as an institution
5.2 Why Did Marriage Only Emerge After Sin?
Marriage as an institution has functions:
- Function | Explanation
- Preserving offspring | In a sinful world, offspring need to be protected and raised in a stable bond
- Regulating desire | Sexual desire emerged after sin; marriage becomes the legitimate channel for it (1 Cor. 7:2)
- Restraining sin | Marriage prevents sexual immorality and maintains faithfulness
- Picture of Christ | In Ephesians 5, marriage is used as a metaphor for the unity of Christ and the church
Matthew 19:8:
"Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so."
Jesus Himself acknowledged that marriage had been adapted to the condition of the fallen world — not the reality "from the beginning."
---
Chapter 6: Radical Implications for Theology
6.1 Marriage Is Not the Purpose of Creation
If marriage is not Edenic reality and not eternal reality, then:
- False Statement | Correction
- "God created marriage as the purpose of humanity" | The purpose of humanity is fellowship with God — marriage is a means in the fallen world
- "Marriage is the most perfect image of God" | The most perfect image of God is Christ — marriage is only a shadow (Eph. 5:32)
- "Marriage is a universal calling" | Paul actually says it is better not to marry (1 Cor. 7:7-8, 32-35) — marriage is not an obligation
6.2 Nakedness and Sexuality
If nakedness in Eden was "without shame," this means:
- Implication | Explanation
- Sexuality is not sin | But sexual desire (as a response to sin) is a post-fall reality
- Nakedness is not eroticism | In Eden, nakedness was transparency, not passion
- Shame is not "moral" | Shame is an indicator of distance, not an indicator of "sexual sin"
6.3 Eschatology and Marriage
If in heaven there is no marriage (Matt. 22:30), then:
- Conclusion | Explanation
- Marriage is temporary | It will end when unity with God is fully restored
- The true "one flesh" unity is Christ | In Christ, we become one body, one spirit (1 Cor. 6:17)
- Celibacy is not a deficiency | Paul actually regards celibacy as a higher calling (1 Cor. 7:32-35)
---
Chapter 7: Conclusion and Synthesis
7.1 Summary of Findings
- Point | Finding
- 1 | Genesis 2:24 is prolepsis, not a description of Eden
- 2 | "One flesh" is ontological reality, not the institution of marriage
- 3 | Nakedness without shame indicates the absence of divided self-consciousness
- 4 | Marriage as an institution emerged after sin
- 5 | Marriage is temporary reality, not eternal
7.2 Corrections for Future Teaching
- False Teaching | Corrected Teaching
- "Marriage is the original creation" | "Marriage is God's gift for the fallen world"
- "God created marriage in Eden" | "God created humanity as a unity — marriage emerged later as a restraint on sin"
- "One flesh = marriage" | "One flesh = existential unity — marriage is one of its expressions in the fallen world"
7.3 Closing
The previous article distinguished between 'ishah and Chavvah — generic designation and personal name, declaration of origin and declaration of faith.
This article continues that correction by distinguishing:
"One flesh" in Eden = ontological unity before God, without distance, without shame.
Marriage in the fallen world = institution that regulates offspring, desire, and faithfulness.
The two are often conflated, with fatal consequences:
- Marriage becomes humanity's "ultimate purpose."
- Celibacy is considered "less perfect."
- Marriage eschatology is obscured.
But if we read the text honestly, we see:
Humanity's purpose is not to marry, but to have fellowship with God. Marriage is a means in the fallen world. True unity — perfect "one flesh" — will be fulfilled in Christ, when we become one spirit with Him.
---
Bibliography
Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS)
Brown, F., Driver, S.R., & Briggs, C.A. (1906). A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament.
Waltke, B.K., & O'Connor, M. (1990). An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax.
Wenham, G.J. (1987). Word Biblical Commentary: Genesis 1-15. Word Books.
Hamilton, V.P. (1990). The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17. Eerdmans.
Barth, K. (1958). Church Dogmatics III/2: The Doctrine of Creation. T&T Clark.
Von Rad, G. (1972). Genesis: A Commentary. Westminster Press.
---
Appendix: Comparison of "One Flesh" Usage in the Bible
- Verse | Context | Meaning
- Gen. 2:24 | Creation narrative | Prolepsis about human unity
- Gen. 29:14 | Laban to Jacob | "Bone and flesh" — kinship relationship
- Gen. 37:27 | Joseph sold | "His blood" — brotherly identity
- 2 Sam. 5:1 | Tribes to David | "Your bone and flesh" — national unity
- Eph. 5:31-32 | Marriage and Christ-church | Metaphor for the unity of Christ and the church
- 1 Cor. 6:16-17 | Sexual immorality vs. union with the Lord | Two kinds of "one flesh": sin and salvation
---
End of Article
---
Disclaimer: This article is the result of exegetical research based on the Masoretic Hebrew text and the Judeo-Christian interpretive tradition. This reading does not aim to abolish marriage, but to restore it to its proper proportion within the overall biblical narrative: as God's gift for the fallen world, not as the ultimate purpose of creation.
Komentar
Posting Komentar